Domain Asset Holdings

Just another Cybersquatter. If there was any company that would best represent human trash, it would be this company. Seriously, if they own a domain you’ve been looking at, don’t give them money; that’s like giving money to a human child trafficker. Just find a different domain or consider legal action, which is probably cheaper. See if you can file a Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy with ICANN.

There has got to be a special place in hell for people who go out and reserve (or should I say «hog») really good domain names, with the sole intent to SELL them, not to actually use them. I could not believe my eyes when I was surfing around for a domain name (luckily, NOT one of these names below), and during my search, this «suggestion page» somehow popped up.
These are really good domain names, and I’m sure there are lots of photographers who would love to have them. But I can’t think of one f — ing photographer in the world, who would have $ 60,000 to spare, to actually buy something like «
.» Give me a break! So, the name just sits there, collecting dust.
Maybe pigs (oops sorry I mean businesses) like these might think this is some kind of cheap deal when, after all, «busi​ness​.com» sold for 7.5 million dollars in 1999, and
sold for $ 14 million in 2006. But give me a break. You’re not going to sell a PHOTOGRAPHY website for $ 60,000. Shame on Domain Asset Holdings for making that kind of assumption!
I don’t give a —- if this IS America. If you’re not going to actually USE a domain name, you shouldn’t get to hold it for years on end, just waiting for someone to buy it from you when you’re not actually intending to use it yourself. I do understand that some people reserve domain names with the intent to use them, but they just haven’t had time to put their site together the way they want it. I get that, and I emphasize with that.
But as for these other people who snatch up domain after domain, taking up really good names with no intention whatsoever of actually using them, themselves… that is just wrong. I wish they could make it some kind of law, that if you have a website, you better actually use it for something that is actually relevant to the site. Otherwise… give it the —- UP.
Just my opinion.